March 15, 2022
New England Prep Hockey Standings 2021-22
| Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimball Union | 28-3-1 | .891 | 57 | 163 | 61 | +102 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Avon Old Farms | 23-4-0 | .852 | 46 | 121 | 38 | +83 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Belmont Hill | 20-3-3 | .827 | 43 | 90 | 37 | +53 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Salisbury | 23-5-0 | .821 | 46 | 132 | 44 | +88 | 5-0-0 | W9 |
| Holderness | 20-4-3 | .796 | 43 | 125 | 54 | +71 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
| St. Mark's | 20-6-2 | .750 | 42 | 126 | 52 | +74 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| St. Sebastian's | 18-6-1 | .740 | 37 | 114 | 66 | +48 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Dexter | 17-5-3 | .740 | 37 | 110 | 63 | +47 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Brunswick | 19-7-0 | .731 | 38 | 115 | 69 | +46 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Worcester Academy | 17-6-1 | .729 | 35 | 113 | 68 | +45 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
| Kent | 20-8-0 | .714 | 40 | 113 | 71 | +42 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
| Exeter | 18-7-3 | .696 | 39 | 97 | 57 | +40 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Pomfret | 16-6-4 | .692 | 36 | 103 | 56 | +47 | 4-1-0 | W4 |
| Cushing | 16-7-3 | .673 | 35 | 86 | 57 | +29 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Frederick Gunn School | 22-12-0 | .647 | 44 | 111 | 90 | +21 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Portsmouth Abbey | 17-9-3 | .638 | 37 | 103 | 73 | +30 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
| St. George's | 13-7-4 | .625 | 30 | 73 | 49 | +24 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Northfield Mt. Hermon | 14-8-3 | .620 | 31 | 83 | 57 | +26 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
| Noble & Greenough | 15-9-2 | .615 | 32 | 82 | 62 | +20 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
| Hebron | 16-10-1 | .611 | 33 | 89 | 96 | -7 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
| Rivers | 13-8-2 | .609 | 28 | 69 | 48 | +21 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
| Westminster | 14-10-2 | .577 | 30 | 84 | 61 | +23 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| Tilton | 13-10-1 | .563 | 27 | 110 | 79 | +31 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
| Loomis Chaffee | 14-11-0 | .560 | 28 | 82 | 68 | +14 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Brooks | 11-9-4 | .542 | 26 | 59 | 47 | +12 | 3-1-1 | W1 |
| Berkshire | 12-10-3 | .540 | 27 | 70 | 62 | +8 | 3-2-0 | L2 |
| Andover | 15-13-0 | .536 | 30 | 105 | 100 | +5 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
| Governor's | 13-12-4 | .517 | 30 | 81 | 78 | +3 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Tabor | 11-12-2 | .480 | 24 | 86 | 83 | +3 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
| Milton | 9-10-1 | .475 | 19 | 60 | 52 | +8 | 3-2-0 | W3 |
| North Yarmouth Academy | 11-13-1 | .460 | 23 | 83 | 100 | -17 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Millbrook | 9-11-3 | .457 | 21 | 59 | 62 | -3 | 2-2-1 | W1 |
| Brewster Academy | 11-15-1 | .426 | 23 | 81 | 104 | -23 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
| New Hampton | 12-17-2 | .419 | 26 | 107 | 112 | -5 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| St. Paul's | 9-14-1 | .396 | 19 | 64 | 76 | -12 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
| Canterbury | 7-13-4 | .375 | 18 | 76 | 96 | -20 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
| Middlesex | 7-13-3 | .370 | 17 | 52 | 74 | -22 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
| Taft | 7-13-2 | .364 | 16 | 55 | 69 | -14 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| Winchendon | 7-14-4 | .360 | 18 | 60 | 79 | -19 | 1-2-2 | W1 |
| Proctor | 8-15-0 | .348 | 16 | 66 | 100 | -34 | 0-5-0 | L5 |
| Trinity-Pawling | 8-16-1 | .340 | 17 | 86 | 110 | -24 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| Deerfield | 8-16-0 | .333 | 16 | 56 | 75 | -19 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Williston Northampton | 8-16-0 | .333 | 16 | 62 | 96 | -34 | 2-3-0 | L3 |
| Thayer | 7-15-0 | .318 | 14 | 67 | 89 | -22 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| Wyoming Seminary | 3-8-0 | .273 | 6 | 14 | 42 | -28 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
| Pingree | 6-18-2 | .269 | 14 | 56 | 108 | -52 | 0-5-0 | L5 |
| Lawrence Academy | 5-15-1 | .262 | 11 | 59 | 85 | -26 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Roxbury Latin | 3-12-2 | .235 | 8 | 35 | 78 | -43 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
| Choate | 4-17-3 | .229 | 11 | 40 | 115 | -75 | 0-4-1 | L2 |
| Kents Hill | 4-16-1 | .214 | 9 | 51 | 99 | -48 | 0-4-1 | L3 |
| Hotchkiss | 4-16-0 | .200 | 8 | 35 | 81 | -46 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
| BB&N | 4-18-1 | .196 | 9 | 46 | 136 | -90 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
| Albany Academy | 3-16-1 | .175 | 7 | 35 | 67 | -32 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
| Vermont Academy | 4-21-1 | .173 | 9 | 58 | 132 | -74 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Groton | 1-15-2 | .111 | 4 | 29 | 73 | -44 | 0-5-0 | L6 |
| Hoosac | 1-19-1 | .071 | 3 | 27 | 130 | -103 | 0-5-0 | L14 |
| Berwick | 1-23-0 | .042 | 2 | 41 | 143 | -102 | 0-5-0 | L12 |
| Moses Brown | 0-1-0 | .000 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0-1-0 | L1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against Divisional Opponents.
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.
